[ad_1]
At least 11 out of 12 members of the Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board have resigned to oppose “unprecedented intervention” Tusrap Administration officials, he claimed in a statement on the substation.
The statement posted on 11 June stated the title ‘Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board Uses Details’ that board members voted to vote to resign “instead of” supporting unprecedented works … to compromise national interests and integrity “.
especially, AP Told that a board member has not attended a large -scale resignation. Board member Carmen Estrada Shay told the agency, “I was appointed by the chairman United States, And I intend to fill my term. ,
According to the statement, the Trump administration refused to receive the prestigious awards to several American academics and dismissed the scholarship for the 2025–2026 academic year. In addition, he accused the “unauthorized review” of 1,200 foreigners Fulbright Recipient.
As new York TimesWho broke the story, US State Department officials canceled Fulbright Scholarship for about 200 American professors and researchers in universities and research centers abroad.
Why step? Major issues raised by the board:
- The board alleges that the current administration, against the missions and values of Fulbright, with free speech and educational freedom.
- When America Congress The Fulbright Scholarship Program was established, the board was given a final approval on the applicants and screening by non -carriers in the state department.
- It said that more than 35 foreign governments correspond to the American contribution to the program or are more than.
- The board said that its written objections for senior administration officials failed to receive a response, and failed to continue the service … We believe that we would take the risk of legalizing the tasks that we believe and damage this stored program and abroad and the integrity of America’s credibility abroad. ,
How has the government responded? The state department calls us…
A US State Department In official, media statements, collective resignation was rejected as politically motivated. He also disputed the claims of the board’s freedom and said that this is the final place on the application.
“It is ridiculous to assume that these members will continue to say final on the application process, especially when it comes to determining educational suitability and alignment with the President. Trump executive Order. It is claimed that the Fulbright-Has Act is particularly incorrect, saying exclusive and final on Fulbright Applications for Fulbright Board. This is nothing, but an attempt of a political stunt to weaken President Trump, ”the official said.
He said, “12 members of the Fulbright Board were partisan political appointments of the Biden administration. It is ridiculous to believe that these members would continue to say final on the application process, especially when it comes to determining academic suitability and alignment with the executive orders of President Trump,” he said.
AP said that in addition to Estrada Shay, 11 members of the board were elected under the former US President. Joe Biden,
Read full details: ‘Government Authority, refusal to Fulbright Awards, reviewing 1,200 recipients’
“Immediately effective, the Congress’s essential Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board members voted heavy to resign from the board, rather than that we support unprecedented works, which we believe that we are imprected under the law, compromise US national interests and integrity, and establish the mission at least 80 years ago for the Fulbright Program.
In the establishment of the program, the Congress clearly specified that the Fulbright Board has the final approval authority of the applicants, which occurs in the state department after a complete and intentional, a year-long process led by non-party career employees and embassies around the world. The process consists of 49 dominated, treaty-based commissions and over 150 countries, contributing an important amount of annual funds for the Fulbright Program. In fact, 35+ foreign governments correspond to or more than the annual contribution of the US government.
Equally, under the Democratic and Republican administration, the board has followed the law, which is working with its legal mandate with freedom. Indeed, the Fulbright-Haas Act emphasizes the non-political and non-ideological character of the program.
However, the current administration has fulfilled and refused the board’s authority Fulbrite Awards For adequate number of persons selected for 2025–2026 academic year. The administration may currently subject an additional 1,200 foreign Fulbrite recipients to a unauthorized review process and may reject more. We believe that these actions not only refute the law, but are also an anthetical for Fulbright Mission and values, including free speech and educational freedom, which the Congress specified in the law.
It is worth noting that the awards that were overried include studies in categories like biology, engineering, architecture, agriculture, crop science, animal science, biochemistry, medical science, music and history.
Through generations of war And peace, Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Program has been a bilateral column of American diplomacy – which is a permanent symbol of our country’s mutual understanding and diplomacy, educational excellence and commitment to international cooperation. This has promoted American interests and global stability. Eastern students of Fulbright have become leaders of government, industry, academics, art and culture in every part of the world.
Members of the Congress of both parties face reputation and economic benefits in their home state colleges and universities that support such reputed students and alumni.
This pride legacy depends on one thing above all: the integrity of the selection process of the program based on merit, not ideology, and from its insulation Political interventionThat integrity has now been reduced.
We include these legal issues and senior administration officials on several occasions, writing. Authorities have refused to accept or respond to the board, even according to the law, they have failed to make good confidence efforts to correct and operate the program.
Our resignation is not a decision that we take lightly. But after the administration continuously ignore the request of the board, to continue the service that they follow the law, which are valid that we believe that we are recognized and damage this stored program and abroad abroad. Indeed, the erosion of the Fulbright Program weakens the US and our national security interests. Institutions and laws of law have been distinguished by our country for about 250 years. As a board, we are proud of our leadership of the program, the way we have worked to maintain our missions, integrity and adherence to law.
It is our honest hope that the Congress, courts and future Fulbright Board administration will stop the efforts of one of our country’s most respected and valuable programs to abolish, disintegrate or end up. Injecting politics and ideological mandate Fulbright program The law and spirit of the law violates that the Congress had established wisely about eight decades ago. ,
About Fulbright Scholarship
To promote international exchange and American diplomacy in 1946, was established about 80 years ago, Fulbright Scholarship A high -selective program is that in the US annual 9,000 scholarships and more than 160 other countries award students, scholars and professionals in many fields.
It was set up under the law introduced by the US State Department’s educational and cultural affairs (ECA), a law introduced by Arkansas’ late Senator J William Fulbright.
According to the Fulbright website, its alumni include 62 Nobel Prize winners and 93. Pulitzer Recipient. Some notable alumni include Felip VI, the king of Spain; Luke Freeden, Prime Minister of Luxembourg; Leslie Voltaire, President of Haiti’s Transitional Principal Council; And Muhammad Younus, Chief Advisor to Bangladesh.
How many Indians will be affected?
United States -India Educational Foundation (USIF) conducts Fulbright Program in India, according to which American Embassy In India’s website.
It states that India’s program is “the largest with more than 350 fellowships”. Donald Trump’s crack on immigration and foreign students in the US is likely to affect the “thousands” of Indian students.
Sanjog Anand, co-founder of Rostrum Education, told Business Standard in May, “India has become a major source of international students in America. More than 331,600 Indian student The 2023–24 was enrolled in the US during the academic year, which led to about 30 percent of the international student body. ,
(With input from Bloomberg and AP)
[ad_2]
