[ad_1]
Artificial Intelligence was struggling to estimate the result of the infamous secret and unexpected process on Wednesday, by which Catholic cardinals choose a new Pope.
Pope Francis’s death on 21 April triggers the period of mourning in the Catholic Church, but also started a race for his successor, from the inner Vatican sources to the bookies to guess who it would be.
AFP asked four AI chatbots – which includes Openi’s chat and billionaire Elon Musk’s groukes – for insight into potential forearm with mixed results.
Mithun of Groke and Google said that his top contender is Italian Cardinal Pitro Paroline, the number two of the Vatican during almost all papsi in Francis.
“Based on current analysis and major discussions, Cardinal Pitro Parolin emerges as a strong contender,” said Mithun.
But it also listed some eight others – including the major pick of chat.
“If I had to make a prediction based on the current trends, influence, and the direction that the church has taken under the Pope Francis stands out as the Cardinal Louis Antonio Tagel as the most potential candidate,” said Open AI’s chat.
Tagel is seen as a prominent lawyer for Asia’s papsi and like Francis, poor, migrants and marginalized people.
But a similarity in chatbots’ reactions stood out.
Each emphasized the near impossibility of forecasting the result.
“It is important to understand that while AI can analyze data and identify patterns, the next Pope predicts include factors that go beyond data analysis,” Mithun said.
These include the religious stance, age, experience and secrecy of the cardinals of the cardinals.
Chatgpt made it clear that its estimate was “not a prediction in the crystal ball sense”, but “A” is here that can consider the kind of cardinals “.
Meanwhile, the French company Mistral AI refused to pull into the game of estimates.
“I do not have the ability to predict or speculate who will be the next Pope,” said this.
Mistral made a suggestion: “For the most accurate and updated information, I recommend to follow reliable news sources.”
[ad_2]
