[ad_1]
Last update:
The name of Mohammad Yunus is also among the 100 most influential celebrities of Time magazine. But now questions are being raised on this selection of Times magazine. The question is who is kind to Mohammad Yunus and for what reason Time has top 100 …Read more
Mohammad Yunus also named Time magazine in the list of 100 most influential celebrities in the world. (File photo)
Highlights
- Mohammad Yunus included in 100 influential celebrities of Time.
- Yunus accused of bypassing a democratic process.
- Mohammad Yunus claims to have support from America
The recent list of Time magazine with the world’s 100 most influential celebrities has included the Nobel Prize winner and the name of the interim government chief Mohammad Yunus in Bangladesh. But now questions are being raised on this selection of Times magazine. Critics allege that Yunus ignored the democratic process and captured power.
Questions are arising as to who is kind to Mohammad Yunus, at first he took out the country by taking out the country of the democratic Sheikh Hasina in a democratic manner. Mohammad Yunus not only hurt the democratic structure of Bangladesh, but has also unnecessarily enmity with India. Yunus’s rhetoric and policy conflict against India, which has always been in favor of Bangladesh’s development and stability, shows that he only pretends peace, in fact his attitude is completely opposite.
Whose hand behind Yunus?
By the way, Mohammad Yunus has support from America. It is believed that the previous Bidan government was very kind to them. Pictures of the meeting between Younis and Biden in September 2024 after Bangladesh got power clarified it.
Sheikh Hasina also accused Mohammad Yunus of destabilizing Bangladesh with foreign forces. He described Yunus as ‘hungry of power’, which is ruining the country.
It is ironic that the person who has received the Nobel Peace Prize, has become a symbol of unrest today. Political instability in Bangladesh and violence against Hindu minorities question Yunus’s intention.
In such a situation, inclusion of them in the list of 100 most influential people in the world from Time magazine, raises questions on the credibility and neutrality of time itself. Is this selection respect for a true achievement, or is this another attempt by Western media to brighten its desired heroes?
[ad_2]
