[ad_1]
,
A series of external factors including exercise and smoking – collectively dubbed “exposome” – was about 10 times more likely to explain premature mortality than genetic risk factors, Oxford University and Massachusetts General Hospital Scientists said in Nature Medicine Journal.
He analyzed mortality trends in the UK Biobank, which collects medical and genetic data from around 500,000 people.
Studies suggest how the extensive social references and the possibility of environmental disease shape, as governments and payments as an important factor that wrestling with rising health care costs and how to deal with an aging society. Long -term life -about factors were proxy for wealth and status, such as the year of education, the use of gym and domestic income.
Understanding the role of environmental factors in aging “can have a profound impact on improvement in health for all of us,” said Austin Argentary, a researcher at the Massachusetts General Hospital, analytical and translated genetic unit. “We were surprised at how much the difference was, how much environment matters.”
Childhood factors, also include whether a mother used to smoke around her child’s time of birth and being a person’s “relatively plumper” at the age of 10, cellular signs of aging as an adult Was also connected to The shorter mortality at the age of 10 was associated with the risk, however.
“We are not prisoners of our genes,” Amy Obellak, a professor of health psychology at Surrey University, who was not involved in research, said in a comment while reacting to the study distributed by the Science Media Center. “If we know where we are born and how we determine the chances of aging well – or are dying prematurely – why is policy action so slow?”
Such more stories are available on bloomberg.com
[ad_2]
