[ad_1]
By Detrich Nauth and Jack Queen
-A landmark trial on Monday closed to use for a legal challenge for long -standing criteria by the administration of Donald Trump’s National Guard Forces and supporting protests in Los Angeles, deploying troops on American roads.
The three-day non-jurish trial in front of San Francisco-based US District Judge Charles Breer will determine whether the government had violated the 19th century law, which makes the army bar from military law enforcement when Trump deployed soldiers in June, as California state claims claims in its legal challenge.
Breyer said at the beginning of a Monday court hearing, “The court should question whether the army was used to implement the domestic law, and if yes, what is a danger that it can be done again.”
Los Angeles experienced the days of disturbance and protests launched a large -scale immigration raid at the places where people gather to find work, such as a home depot store, a garment factory and a warehouse.
The administration denies that soldiers were used in civil law enforcement and it is planned to show that they were protecting federal property and American immigration and customs enforcement agents.
Many soldiers have been withdrawn, but California Attorney General Rob Bonta said on Monday that 300 National Guard members are still going on immigration and restricting civil movements in the state. The Trump administration last week enhanced the activation of troops in the Los Angeles region through a court filing in a court by the state’s Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom.
“The federal government deployed military troops on the streets of Los Angeles for the objectives of political theater and public threats,” Bonta said in a statement. “This dangerous step is not an example in American history.”
California and Newsom have asked Breare to ban soldiers from directly participating in domestic law enforcement activities. They say that the National Guard is assisting in violation of the Pos Committetus Act and other laws of 1878, assisting and arrests with ice agents on raids, which refuse the US Army to participate in the Civil Law Enforcement.
The Republican President ordered 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard soldiers in Los Angeles in June against Newsom’s wishes. The California’s case eventually gives a verdict that would return its National Guard soldiers under state control and a declaration that Trump’s action was illegal.
Breyer will have a limited impact of testing, however, Trump’s plan to deploy hundreds of national guard soldiers in Washington on a plan to deploy a rift on violent crime in the US capital city on a plan to deploy a crack on a plan that violent crime hit a 30 -year -low in 2024.
“I am deploying the National Guard to help re -establish laws, orders and public safety in Washington, DC,” Trump said on Monday. “And they are going to allow their work to be done properly.”
Unlike California and other states, where the governors usually decide that the President directly controls the National Guard in Washington to activate the guard soldiers.
A decision against the administration can restrict the actions of those soldiers and disrupt Trump if he deploys such forces to the police in other American cities.
Trump said his efforts to fight crime would go beyond Washington and mention Chicago, Los Angeles, New York and Baltimore.
Trump’s decision to send soldiers to Los Angeles inspired a national debate about the use of the army on American soil and provoked political tension in the American city for the second time.
An American appeal court has allowed Trump to maintain control of California’s National Guard during a legal challenge.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without amending the text.
[ad_2]
